Disclaimer
Information provided on this website is general in nature and does not constitute financial advice. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided is accurate. Individuals must not rely on this information to make a financial or investment decision. Before making any decision, we recommend you consult a financial adviser to take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs.
A FinSec View – Market Updates, Your Wealth Transfer plan, The Economic Summit Overview & more….

| 15th August 2025 |
|
|
|
|
Decoding US trade policy and rising tariffsWith tariffs taking centre stage in the global economy, it’s important for investors to understand that not all trade barriers are created equal. With that in mind, we’re sharing an overview by global management firm Capital Group, which indicates that tariffs are generally used for four purposes that may have differing impacts in the years ahead.
“These motivations will have an important role in determining how the story plays out,” according to Capital Group economist Jared Franz. “Tariffs used for negotiating purposes are unlikely to persist, while those that are part of a larger decoupling process could be here to stay.” Has Europe reached a turning point?While the US relies on the blunt use of tariffs to support its economy, European governments are taking bold and innovative measures to strengthen their own positions through strategic adjustments, investment in emerging sectors, and a strong commitment to sustainability and technological progress. Germany has eased its fiscal rules, unveiling a €1 trillion stimulus package. The rise in government expenditure could lead to a stronger industrial cycle over the next three years, potentially benefiting defence, building materials, and infrastructure companies — sectors that are more prominent in European indices than in the tech-focused S&P 500 Index. Its “Industrie 4.0” program aims to digitise manufacturing, automate supply chains, and promote green technologies. German Mittelstand (SMEs) firms have increased their focus on R&D and partnerships with universities, positioning themselves at the forefront of industrial innovation. Europe isn’t just reliant on traditional industries. In fact, the latest global rankings show that seven of the top 10 countries for innovation are in Europe.
Nordic countries, long celebrated for their digital governance and social innovation, are attracting even more global investment in clean energy, digital health, and sustainable urban planning, with Stockholm and Copenhagen particularly popular among venture capitalists. Not willing to be left behind, France has branded itself as “La French Tech,” with government-backed initiatives to reduce barriers for entrepreneurs and encourage scale-ups. Paris has become a magnet for fintech and AI startups, attracting both domestic and international capital as investors seek alternatives to Silicon Valley. European pharmaceutical companies have long been linked to innovative treatments. Novo Nordisk was the first to introduce GLP-1 therapies for diabetes and weight management, while UK-based AstraZeneca leads in oncology. France’s EssilorLuxottica, owner of Ray-Ban and other eyewear brands, is developing its own smart glasses that seamlessly incorporate advanced hearing aid technology into fashionable eyewear. It might be 2026 before growth meaningfully picks up in Europe, considering the uncertainty around tariffs. However, a more pro-investment regulatory environment could represent a significant shift from previous patterns. Super tax update – why only June 30, 2026, matters
Since the Federal Election, the Albanese Government has made it clear it will be proceeding with the introduction of the Division 296 tax on superannuation balances, although it has delayed the re-introduction of its legislation to Parliament until after next week’s Economic Roundtable. While Division 296 – as the additional tax of 15% on super balances over $3 million is officially known – hasn’t become law yet, the clock has been ticking since July 1. How the tax is determined in its first year is based on the percentage of your super balance that exceeds $3 million on June 30, 2026. Given there is no law yet, and even if it is passed before the end of this year, you still have until close to June 30 next year to either do nothing or act. If your super balance on June 30, 2026, is exactly $3 million or less, then 0% per cent is greater than $3 million and no Division 296 tax will be imposed on your super. Division 296 applies to individuals, not couples, so a couple could have up to $6 million in super and not be liable for additional tax. (Of course, if inheriting your spouse’s super balance is more than likely to tip you above the Division 296 threshold, and therefore it is definitely worth having a strategy in place for that eventuality.) If, for example, your super balance was under $3 million at the start of this financial year but creeps over the $3 million threshold by June 30, 2026, it’s that extra amount you have to consider. Where you have a balance of less than $3 million at the start of the financial year but end up with one greater than $3 million at the end of year, Division 296 calculates it as if your year started with a $3 million balance. Let’s say your super balance on July 1 was $2 million and that by June 30, 2026, it has grown to be $3.1 million. Despite the large increase in your fund from $2 million to $3.1 million, your Division 296 liability will be significantly less, given it won’t include the increase in your total super below the $3 million threshold. The 15 per cent tax will only apply to the percentage that $100,000 represents of $3.1 million, or 3.23% of the total balance. While 15 per cent of $100,000 is $15,000, 3.23% of this results in a Division 296 tax liability of $484.50. Compare that to possible other taxes, such as capital gains, you might be subjected to, should you consider other strategies to keep your super balance under $3 million. Taking action to avoid one tax (Division 296 tax) might trigger another one (capital gains tax), which could be even higher. Check with your financial advisor whether you’re likely to exceed the $3 million threshold by June 30, 2026, and discuss your options. |
|
That’s the divide between men and women in Australia who feel confident about the wealth transfer plan they have in place. Australian wealth management firm Wilsons Advisory has released an insightful report into Australia’s looming intergenerational wealth transfer and the attitudes, concerns and strategies that some high-net-worth Australians have in place.
It’s less than a decade before the first of Generation Xers (born 1965-1981) will reach preservation age (when they can access their super), a pivotal moment in Australia’s wealth transfer from Baby Boomers (1946-1964) and those born just prior to or during World War II, known as the Silent Generation (1928-1945). The report, The Generational Blueprint – How the wealthy secure their legacy, reveals key trends in how families are planning (or not planning) for the future, including: – Only 32% of high-net-worth Australians fully engage their families in wealth discussions – Younger generations are more proactive about planning, but often lack support – Fairness, tax implications, and confidence in the readiness of heirs to manage the legacy are top concerns – Men tend to focus on investment returns, while women prioritise control, financial literacy, and long-term security, often seeking deeper educational advice. If you’re family is tip-toeing around these tricky conversations, you’re not alone. Your adviser at FinSec Partners can help you start the journey of your family’s succession and wealth planning needs. Will tax hijack productivity and fundamental economic change at Chalmer’s economic summit?Anyone with a bank account, super, a family trust, a share portfolio, or a pension, who pays tax personally or corporately, is in a union, owns a business, works in banking and finance, or has an interest in policy and regulation, is likely to be paying attention to Canberra next week. About 25 select invitees will gather around Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ metaphorical Economic Roundtable from August 19-21 to discuss ways to improve Australia’s productivity, economic resilience, and budget sustainability, as well as tax reform. Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock will be the keynote speaker at the resilience session, and Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood will open the productivity session. Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally will deliver a presentation at the tax session titled “A better tax system”. Grattan contributed to drafting Labor’s 2019 election platform on tax, including its proposals to cut tax concessions for superannuation, capital gains, and negative gearing. Labor also unsuccessfully campaigned to regulate franking credits and trusts. The economic roundtable occurs three years after Labor caught businesses off guard at the Jobs and Skills Summit by arranging a deal with unions for industrial relations reforms. Few believe the Government doesn’t already have a plan up its sleeve although the PM and Treasurer are trying to lower expectations. While productivity was the original focus of the summit, Chalmers himself has also shifted the pre-discussion to include tax changes, saying he wants to ease the tax burden on working-age Australians and ensure the budget is more sustainable. Still, the property sector is hoping the Albanese Government will use the roundtable to support the cutting of planning red tape and review the national construction code to make construction easier, faster, and cheaper. Fearing the summit could be hijacked by yet another unresolved debate over tax reform, a bloc of 27 business groups, led by the Business Council of Australia, has kept its pre-summit tax demands vague, proposing a quick, three-month tax review later this year involving stakeholders, Treasury, and the Productivity Commission. In its submission, the business bloc states there is also a responsibility on the government to review its spending, which is increasing by 6 per cent annually. “Tax reform, and the trade-offs it entails, should not be pursued or evaluated separately from government efficiency measures and spending restraint to ensure government lives within its means, as well as enacting broader productivity-enhancing reforms,” its submission says. Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson will lead a discussion at the roundtable on the role of budget sustainability. Wilkinson was, until recently, head of the Department of Finance, which is responsible for the spending side of the budget. The Productivity Commission has recommended cutting the corporate tax rate to 20 per cent for small and medium companies but increasing the tax burden on large businesses with revenue above $1 billion. While about 99 per cent of companies would pay less tax under the reform, roughly 500 of Australia’s largest companies, including banks, miners, and supermarkets, would not see a reduction in the current 30 per cent corporate rate. Treasury has also increased its scrutiny of family trusts, revealing last year that around 1.7 million people received nearly $60 billion in income from these tax-efficient investment vehicles. To deter “excessive investment” in leveraged property, some at the roundtable support, especially the NFP sector, reducing the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to between 25 and 30 per cent, and limiting negative-gearing. There’s also support for taxing trusts more heavily to reduce tax minimisation strategies. Our expectation is that wealth taxes, hitting family trusts and super balances, as well as more formal “death duties” are likely outcomes. We’ll look at the takeaways from the roundtable next month. Who has been invited? Known attendees include:
And here is the agenda:
|
Friday Funny
|











